My work asks what constitutional and administrative law look like when they are read from the vernacular of particular places, from their own categories and moral vocabularies, rather than translated into the terms of a few Western systems.
Much of it begins in Indonesia. I am interested in what I call vernacular parochialism: the idea that legal concepts never travel unchanged, and that taking local understandings seriously may change how we think about law in general.
How do people make constitutional sense of a state without reading its constitution?
Folk constitutionalism and Pancasila. Related: Comparative Political Theory (2026) on negara kesatuan; a book in progress.
Is administrative law a technique of legality, or a technology of justice?
Administrative justice as each polity lives it, beyond the developed West.
What happens to law and religion when the Christian West is not the starting point?
An essay in progress.
What does legal reform look like for a self that is relational?
With Beth Lyon, on farmworkers in West Java (Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 2024).
I try to teach law as a humanistic enterprise.
Legal concepts never travel unchanged. In class I ask students to read the law closely, in the places and languages where it is lived, and to notice what is lost when it is carried into someone else’s terms. I learn as much from these conversations as they do, I suppose.

Founding editor of the Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law and founder of the Institute for Migrant Rights.
I studied in Yogyakarta, Ithaca and Montreal.